The University of Texas was unsuccessful in a bad faith domain name action to acquire http://www.texassports.org.
The University is the owner of www.texassports.com and registered trademarks for: TEXAS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, TEXAS LONGHORNS, and LONGHORNS. In particular, TEXAS is registered for “Entertainment services, namely, providing college athletic and sporting events.”
In the UDRP action, the University asserted http://www.texassports.org was registered in bad faith, that the registrant had no legitimate rights to the name, and the use of the domain may cause confusion with the University’s http://www.texassports.com domain. The domain http://www.texassports.org was used as “parking” website for information related to University of Texas sports and sporting events.
To be successful the University needed to prove:
the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;
the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
The UDRP panel found http://www.texassports.org defense persuasive:
“Texas sports” is geographically descriptive and not protected by trademark. The University does not have the exclusive rights to “Texas” and “Sports.” The University does not have a registered trademark for “Texas Sports.” There is no likelihood of consumer confusion.
The University did not prove “bad faith.” Again, common, geographic terms are not typically going to rise to the level of a bad faith acquisition.
More about the UDRP decision may be found here.



July 28th, 2010 at 1:59 am
[...] has a bit of a history about claiming ridiculously overbroad intellectual property rights, has been knocked down in its attempt to take over the domain texassports.org. Apparently, UT already has texassports.com, and claimed that whoever registered the .org violated [...]
July 28th, 2010 at 2:43 am
[...] has a bit of a history about claiming ridiculously overbroad intellectual property rights, has been knocked down in its attempt to take over the domain texassports.org. Apparently, UT already has texassports.com, and claimed that whoever registered the .org violated [...]
August 3rd, 2010 at 8:34 am
[...] recently sought to acquire the domain name http://www.texassports.com (h/t to Tamera Bennett). UT already owns http://www.texassports.org and wanted to make a claim to the .com version which was a [...]
August 12th, 2010 at 7:44 pm
Tamera – do you know if the generic / descriptive nature of the allegedly infringing mark came specifically into play here? Or was that wrapped up in the “geographically descriptive” analysis? Did the TLD indicator play a role at all?
FWIW – My dad, being a long-time Sooner, would wonder why anyone would want texassports.org at all.
August 24th, 2010 at 11:47 am
I believe the generic/descriptive was all part of the “geographically descriptive” analysis. I don’t recall the TLD being discussed. The .org does raise an interesting question. Typically we see .org in relationship to non-profits. There are specific guidelines on securing a .edu or .gov TLD, but I do not believe there are any restrictions on .org.
Cheers!
Tamera