Podcast: Entertainment Law Update Episode 13

26 Aug

Lucky Episode 13 of the Entertainment Law Update Podcast with hosts  Los Angeles based film lawyer Gordon P. Firemark and Texas based music lawyer Tamera H. Bennett is available here.

Gordon and I had a lot of fun this month discussing multiple topics including:

Justin Bieber’s Twitter “prank”
Judge Gertner’s recent opinion in Sony v. Tenenbaum
Child labor laws and the production of “Kate Plus 8″
Fleeting Expletives
Don Johnson/Alan Ladd, Jr./Celedor — Profit Participation Wins

Take a listen to stay up-to-date on film law, music law, copyright law and trademark law.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

State of Texas Opposes “The Alamo” Trademark Application

30 Jul

On July 23, 2010 the State of Texas filed a Notice of Opposition with the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB) opposing the trademark application for the mark “The Alamo” that was filed The Daughters of the Republic of Texas.

Attorneys for the State assert Texas has a claim to the trademark due to its historical significance, and that ownership of a trademark registration by the Daughters of the Republic of Texas could create consumer confusion.

As previously reported, The Daughters of the Republic of Texas filed a federal trademark application on October 13, 2009 claiming a first use of the mark “The Alamo” on January 26, 1905 for Museum services, namely, exhibiting to the public a historical site. On April 27, 2010, the State of Texas filed an extension of time to oppose the registration of the application.

The Daughters of the Republic of Texas have until September 1, 2010 to file a response with the TTAB.

More information about the opposition can be found here and here.

Tags:

Texassports.org: University of Texas Lost Bad Faith UDRP Action

26 Jul

The University of Texas was unsuccessful in a bad faith domain name action to acquire www.texassports.org.

The University is the owner of www.texassports.com and registered trademarks for:  TEXAS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, TEXAS LONGHORNS, and LONGHORNS.  In particular, TEXAS is registered for “Entertainment services, namely, providing college athletic and sporting events.”

In the UDRP action, the University asserted www.texassports.org was registered in bad faith, that the registrant had no legitimate rights to the name, and the use of the domain may cause confusion with the University’s www.texassports.com domain.  The domain www.texassports.org was used as  “parking” website for information related to University of Texas sports and sporting events.

To be successful the University needed to prove:

the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights;

the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and

the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

The UDRP panel found www.texassports.org defense persuasive:

“Texas sports” is geographically descriptive and not protected by trademark.  The University does not have the exclusive rights to “Texas” and “Sports.”  The University does not have a registered trademark for “Texas Sports.”  There is no likelihood of consumer confusion.

The University did not prove “bad faith.”  Again, common, geographic terms are not typically going to rise to the level of a bad faith acquisition.

More about the UDRP decision may be found here.

Tags: ,

Copyright Termination: 2009 and 2010 Cases of Interest

26 Jul

Copyright terminations under sections 203 and 304 are hot topics in the news and at the courthouse the past 12 months.  2013 will be the first year that terminations can be effective under 17 USC Section 203…. if notice of termination was proper.   For a general overview of the termination process click here for an article written by music lawyer Tamera H. Bennett for the Texas Entertainment Law Institute.

Some of the copyright terminations cases gaining  recent attention include:

  • U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear appeal of John Steinbeck estate.  The Second Circuit  overturned a lower court’s decision and maintained copyrights assigned to Penguin Book Group from Steinbeck’s widow.  This extremely fact specific case turned on the fact that Steinbeck’s wife terminated and renegotiated Steinbeck’s 1939 agreement with Penguin.  This renegotiation in 1994 “cut-off” the rights of Steinbeck’s children from his first marriage.  Penguin Group (USA) v. Steinbeck, 537 F.3d 193 (2d Cir. 2008), cert. denied 2009. 
  • A Southern District of New York judge  ruled the heirs of comic artist Jack Kirby, were subject to transactional jurisdiction under a New York statute by sending copyright transfer termination notices pursuant to 17 USC 304(c).  More information about the case is found hereMarvel Worldwide, Inc. v. Kirby, 2010 WL 1655253 (April 14, 2010)
  • Charlie Daniels’ “The Devil Went Down to Georgia,”was written in 1979, but Copyright Termination could be subject to agreements he signed with Universal Music Publishing Group pre-1978.  This possible “gap” in the copyright law between Section 203 and Section 304 is under review at the Copyright Office.
  • Sherlock Holmes is not yet PD.  Some of the early Sherlock Holmes’ works are public domain, but many are not yet.  Some works were recaptured in 1981 and will remain under U.S. Copyright until 2023, although protection has long expired in the U.K.
  • Superman sends valid copyright termination notices.  This blog post gives some great insight to what is required to send a valid notice of termination under 17 USC Section 304(c).  Siegel v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., CV-04-8400-SGL (RZx),  2009 WL 2512842 (C.D. Cal. 2009).

Tags: , ,

Registration Now Open for Entertainment Law Institute, Austin October 7-8

15 Jul

The 20th Annual Entertainment Law Institute will be held October 7-8, 2010 at the Radisson Hotel & Suites, Austin.

Tamera H. Bennett, Esq. will be presenting on:

  • Protecting an Artist’s Legacy Through Estate Planning, Probate and Post-Death Administration of an Artist’s Rights
  • Be Careful What You Tweet:  Social Networking Legal Issues

More information about the conference and registration is available here.

Legal/Administrative IP – Entertainment Law Assistant Needed

8 Jul

Transactional boutique trademark, copyright and entertainment law firm located in Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex seeks legal/administrative assistant.

The ideal candidate will:

  • have two to four years experience as an administrative assistant in the music business or legal field.
  • have a working knowledge of IP licensing including trademark, copyright and music licensing.
  • be experienced and comfortable with the USPTO online Trademark systems.
  • have a Bachelor’s degree.
  • have superior knowledge of Microsoft Word, Excel, Power Point,  and Outlook.  Accounting/time/billing software experience a plus.

Please forward to bennettlawjob at gmail dot com:
PDF of Resume, which includes references.
PDF of Cover Letter, which includes salary requirements.

Tamera H. Bennett to speak at Tennessee IP Law Association Conference

8 Jul

Trademark, copyright and entertainment lawyer Tamera H. Bennett will speak July 16, 2010 at the Tennessee Intellectual Property Law Association’s Summer 2010 ©LE Semina® in Nashville, Tennessee.

Tamera’s  presentation will focus on recent developments in trademark law.

More information about the conference can be found here.

Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 12 Now Available

1 Jul

In the latest episode of the Entertainment Law Update podcast, Tamera H. Bennett and Gordon Firemark explore:

  • Follow ups on Hot News
  • Viacom loses suit against YouTube.
  • Hurt Locker Suit(s)
  • Idea Theft
  • Tribute Band Names
  • Celebrity Rights of publicity

To listen to the podcast, click here.

Tags: , , , ,

Michael Douglas’ Ex-Wife Sues For “Spinoff”: Wall Street 2

30 Jun

As Michael Douglas’ new film “Wall Street 2″ is set to release later this year, his ex-wife Diandre Douglas has filed suit seeking half of Douglas’ earnings for the film.

The original “Wall Street” film was released in 1987, during the time of Douglas’ 23 year marriage to Diandre.   The couple subsequently divorced  in 2000 and Michael Douglas has since remarried.

At issue is the language of the couple’s divorce decree, which reportedly entitles his ex-wife to receive half of Douglas’ income for any “spinoffs” from work created during the marriage.  But is “Wall Street 2″ a true “spinoff” or a “sequel,” as it continues the storyline of “Wall Street” twenty years later?

The suit is a good reminder to define terms in agreements- “spinoff,” “derivatives,” “presequel,” and “sequel.”

More information about the case can be found here.

Music Pubishing and The Value of “Glee”

28 Jun

Older pop hits are finding new life on the Fox TV series “Glee.

Broadway show tunes, Journey, Madonna, and others are finding both “Glee” covers and originals of their songs selling at the top of  iTunes charts.   As of April 2010, three “Glee” cast albums were in the top 10 of iTunes charts and have sold more than one million units.

Music publishers’ interest in “Glee” was skeptical at first (publishes for Bryan Adams and Coldplay both initially said no), but many are now seeing the potential exposure and monetary value of licensing to the hit show.

In the case of a show such as “Glee,” a synchronization license would be negotiated between the music publisher and the producers of the show for the use.  On-camera performance, featured vocal performance, and beginning/end credits, are licensed for a higher fee than background uses.  With “Glee,” there is often no need to secure master recording rights, as the songs are being re-recorded and performed by the “Glee” cast.  Publishers also receive public performance royalties as tracked by ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC for each airing in the U.S. (and by the related performance society in foreign countries).

Critics of the show have said “Glee” ignores music clearance in its story-lines.  In the real world, so long as the glee club is practicing and performing in class, there is an exemption of a public performance license for classroom instruction.  But, if the Glee club/band/chorus are putting on shows, they do need to get licenses. If it is a dramatic work, the schools should secure a license to put on the play, for musical performances, many times there is a purchase or rental of the sheet music.

Tags:

Dead Celebrities on CBS’ 60 Minutes

28 Jun

CBS’ 60 Minutes feature “A Living for the Dead” focuses on deceased celebrities right of publicity and strategies for maximizing revenue from the use of name and likeness rights.

To view the segment and learn more, click here.

Dallas Surgeon Raises Social Networking Defamation Claim

11 Jun

posted by Tamera H. Bennett

Dallas eye surgeon Dr. Boothe (Boothe Eye Care and Laser Center), is asserting a patient’s statements online may be defamatory in nature and should be removed.

The patient was unhappy with the results from her eye surgery and posted her complaints online.  Dr. Boothe now plans to take a pre-litigation/investigative deposition to determine what, if any evidence, there might be to bring a defamation lawsuit against her.

Attorney Tamera Bennett Interviewed on CW33/Dallas Today

10 Jun

Intellectual property lawyer Tamera Bennett was interviewed today by reporter Giselle Phelps/CW33 regarding the proposed social networking policy for the Lewisville Independent School District (LISD).

The news broadcast will air at 5pm and 9pm CST, today, June 10, 2010.

More about this trending topic can be found at the Dallas Morning News website here.  To view the interview click here.

Universal v. Augusto First Sale Under Copyright Act Appeal

3 Jun

The question before the Seattle Court of Appeals is whether or not the offering for sale of promotional copies of music CD’s is an act of copyright infringement or a protected transaction under the First Sale doctrine of the US Copyright Act.

I blogged here about this case when the trial court ruled in favored of the defendant.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has an interesting post regarding the appeal that will be heard on June 7, 2010.

Music Publishing and Divorce: No Extrinsic Fraud

3 Jun

by Tamera H. Bennett
posted June 3, 2010

The Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio, ruled there was no extrinsic fraud in divorce proceedings when one spouse conveys songs out of a community property music publishing company without the express knowledge of the other spouse.  Sanchez v. Sanchez, No. 04-09-00477-CV (Tex. Civ. App. — San Antonio, June 2, 2010).

Pursuant to a 2006 divorce decree, wife Maria Sanchez was awarded the music publishing company Planeta Latino.  Subsequent to the finalized divorce, Ms. Sanchez discovered certain copyrights were assigned out of the music publishing company prior to the divorce.

The court held this may have been an act of intrinsic fraud — relating to the merits of the issues that were presented and presumably were or should have been settled in the former action.  Basically, the wife, via due diligence prior to the divorce, could have discovered the fraud.

Extrinsic fraud —  is fraud that denied a party the opportunity to fully litigate at trial all the rights or defenses that could have been asserted.

Take away for the day — do your due diligence. Attorneys, make sure you have a paper trail for every song in the music publishing catalog prior to finalizing a divorce or an asset purchase agreement.

Don Henley Successful in Copyright Infringement

2 Jun

A Judge in California District Court ruled that politician Chuck Devore’s new lyrics to “The Boys of Summer” and “All She Wants to Do is Dance” are not a fair use under the Copyright Act.

I blogged about this case earlier here.  The Hollywood Reporter Esq. blog has a fantastic summary of the legal basis behind the judge’s opinion here.

The new lyrics did not rise to the level required for parody, which is a defense to copyright infringement.  The new work (the revised lyrics) must be used to make fun of or ridicule the original work or even the author of the original work.

Interesting fact:  Don Henley is a Texas Native and currently resides on his ranch in East Texas.

Is Holland’s (cafe) Too Close To Harrods (luxury department store)?

1 Jun

Harrods, the luxury London based department store, sent a cease and desist letter to Holland’s Cafe in Essex, England.  The cafe, which opened four months ago, is owned by Mr. Nigel Holland.

This does seem a bit of a stretch for trademark infringement.  I am not seeing a basis for a likelihood of consumer confusion.  Under Texas law, Mr. Holland would most likely be free and clear to use his own name to operate his business.

Entertainment Law Update Podcast: Episode 11

25 May

Episode 11 of the Entertainment Law Update podcast is now available.

Topics in this episode include:

In this Episode:

  • Ethics and the non-practicing attorney… a long tail
  • Zorro draws its sword against M&M candies
  • “Free Scooter!” cries Justin Bieber.
  • Dramatic vs. Non-Dramatic rights in musical works
  • Ride-along producer : Ride-along defendant?
  • Bryant v. Media Right, Orchard
  • Arista v. Lime Group
  • Hot News Misappropriation

For more information or to listen to this episode, click here.

48 Hours to Trademark Lawsuit

19 May

48 hours to produce the first issue of a magazine. An ambitious goal meet by a few friends and 1000′s of content contributors over a weekend in May.

48 Hour:Hustle, a print on-demand magazine, was started on May 7 and issue zero was  wrapped on May 9.  The cease and desist letter from CBS Broadcasting, Inc. was received May 11.  (I calculate 48 hours between release and demand letter…irony).

CBS owns the trademarks for “48 Hours,”  “48 Hours Mystery,” and several other similar marks with “48 Hours.”  The CBS marks are in Class 041 for a television series.

Would a consumer be confused that a magazine named “48 Hour:Hustle” was from the same source as the television show?  I also wonder if an argument could be made by another trademark owner for likelihood of confusion with their mark:  Hustler.

Music Publishers Not Owed Royalty Says Canadian Court

17 May

A Canadian Appeals Court ruled that 30-second samples of songs on download websites are not “performances” and are exempt from public performance royalties in Canada.

Read more from Billboard.

Are the US performance rights organizations BMI, ASCAP and SESAC ready to test the waters in the US to see if “previews” available on iTunes, Amazon and Rhapsody meet the standard of a “public performance” under the US Copyright Act?